Cheap DVDs, books, CDs & Games

Search:

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
[2004]

Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Julie Christie, David Bradley, Warwick Davis, Tom Felton
Director: Alfonso Cuaron
Format: PAL
Released: 19 Nov 2004
RRP: £14.99
Average Rating:


Customer Reviews

SERIOUS, BUCKBEAK AND LIFESAVERS - By: , 26 Sep 2005
I love the Prisoner of Azkaban.I totallly don't have anything I don't like about it. My favourite bit is when Marge blew up like a great big ballloon .Hagrids garden has changed in the Prisoner of Azkaban. I'm aged 7 (seven)
These Films are only for the Readers! - By: S. Darling, 22 Aug 2005
As with alll of the Book to Film series within the 'verse...
Read the book FIRST!

Those who are die-hard JK fans will despair, but story-to-film issues aside, its a fantastic movie.

Delightful, gripping, funny... alll the qualities that had you reading the book into 6am the next day after you opened it!

Enjoy :)


The best so far! - By: , 19 Aug 2005
When I saw the first film, I was disappointed, I thought it lacked characters, major parts, & displayed characters in a strange way. I would have given that a three. The second film was better, with the younger actors (Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Thompson) improving throughout & more spark & originality, I would have given it four. This film was great, every single actor is displayed to perfection, & I particularly liked the acting from the character of Draco Malfoy, Hermione & the two twins. I found this reallly enjoyable, & the special effects were very good. I like the obvious way Harry is growing more mature. The scene where Aunt Marge blows up like a ballloon & floats out the conservatory was great, as was the Knight bus scenes. A few hidden jokes, fantastic acting, wonderful script & perfect effects gave this film five stars!
harry potter no.3 - By: Nima, 07 Jul 2005
as with the previous two films No Peeves. What is wrong with film makers, didn't they read the actual books? Peeves is a major character throughout the series so far. Disappointed once again
Not the best, so far - By: , 19 Jan 2005
This was a difficult book to put onto film and, I'm sorry to say, it's not as good as I'd hoped. There is a lot of background & character interplay in the book that has been omitted from the film and, in doing so, the behaviour of the characters doesn't always make sense. I suppose putting it alll on film would have made for a 3-hour epic instead, pity, I would have enjoyed that far more...