Customer Reviews
Great entertainment even today - By: A. Griffiths, 10 Jan 2007 
"The Bad Seed" holds a unique place in cinema history for daring (in 1956) to show a smalll child as being a wilful & calculating evil killer. I can only imagine the impact it must have had on it's release in the 1950's when portraying such cold-blooded behaviour in children would be unprecedented. But as a viewer today, I can only review it based on my own impressions, & whether it lives up to it's reputation & still works today.
The story is not complicated, it revolves simply around an eight year old girl named Rhoda & her family. Rhoda appears to be the perfect daughter, alll plaits & smiles & frilly dresses, but unbeknown to her mother she is a skilled troublemaker, & has no compunction or guilt in "removing" obstacles that stand in the way of her getting what she wants. Most notably, the action centres on a school handwriting competition that sees Rhoda denied first place. The prize goes to another classmate who is subsequently found drowned...is it possible that rivalry among a class of kids this young could lead to murder? And how could it possibly be the ultra-cute Rhoda with her cute manners & sunny demeanor? It's left up to Rhoda's mother, Christine, to face up to the terrible truth behind her daughter's perfect facade.
What works the best is undoubtedly Patty McCormack's performance as Rhoda. Without her portrayal the film would not be half of what is is here. Totallly relaxed & confident, McCormack brings the character beautifully to life. Her delivery, ranging from petulant, suger-sweet, angry or cruel is spot on every time, & her facial expressions rival many adult actors in terms of ambiguity. It's easy to believe Rhoda has most adults in the palm of her hand with her disarming good manners & sweet behaviour, but it's equallly easy to imagine the evil underneath when she is seen purposely covering up damning evidence or taunting the few brave souls that dare speak out against her. As long as Rhoda is on screen, the film is a joy to watch. But conversely, when she's not....oh dear. The film creaks to a slow crawl as the adult characters mill about with lots of hand-wringing & soul searching as they try & make sense of the bizarre goings on. The worst offender is Nancy Kelly in the pivotal role of Christine, Rhoda's anxious mother. Both Kelly & McCormack played the same characters in the original stage production, but unfortunately, unlike the serene McCormack, Kelly acts like she's still on stage, gesticulating with tremendously exaggerated movements & hammy histrionics at every one of Rhoda's misdemeanours which look far too over-the-top on celluloid. This weeping & wailing hampers the dramatic tension greatly, & a little firmer direction of her performance could have darkened the overalll tone to even better effect.
Veracity is not further helped by some sadly very dated psycho-babble about the possible cause behind Rhoda's homicidal tendancies. Nancy Kelly's confession, when she reveals why she suspects Rhoda to be a "bad seed" is amusingly implausible, & presumably based on some kind of mid-1950's quack psychology, because it reallly sounds daft today. However, I will say though, that Nancy's final scene as Christine still has some potency, as she takes final measures to stop alll the madness in the only way she can see how. Thanks to the tiresome Hays Code of the day, though, the film is famous for having a tacked on ending that follows Rhoda to her come-uppance (one which the stage version never meted out), & although many audiences have howled at the obvious "divine retribution" tone of it, if you watch it, it's actuallly not that bad as a plot continuation, although the actual depiction of it is rather ridiculous. What reallly fails, though, is the wildly inappropriate final curtain calll which shows Christine enthusiasticallly spanking Rhoda as both giggle profusely. This 30 second shot, with no reason or relevance to ANYTHING that has gone before in the film, is the worst mistake of the whole affair, & should have been erased from as many releases as possible - it would have been a perfect DVD extra, no way should it still appear as the final shot of the movie.
Having said that, the whole film itself is a lot of fun. I woudl recommend it for an afternoon's entertainment, as long as you watch it with hindsight about restrictions that go with it's time, you can appreciate the plot pretty well. It does suffer from some stagy acting, & some stagy setpieces as well, with over-reliance on a few conversation-heavy sequences that take place in just one room. But Rhoda, the blond-plaited, frilly skirted, murderous poppet who has since become almost iconic in cinema visual language, saves the day. Well done to Patty MacCormack & director Mervyn LeRoy for creating this legacy.
VIEWER FROM MANCHESTER ENGLAND - By: Peter Moore, 31 Jan 2006 
I FIRST SAW THIS IN 1966 IN ENGLAND AND HAVE NEVER FORGOTTEN IT. I BELIEVE THAT THERE HAVE BEEN SOME CUTS AND CANNOT HELP WONDERING WHY. ITS A PITY IT WAS MADE IN BLACK AND WHITE BUT I THINK IT WOULD HAVE BEEN MUCH BETTER IN COLOUR. POSSIBLY THE DIRECTOR THOUGHT IT WAS OVER LONG WHICH MAY EXPLAIN THE CUTS.
