Cheap DVDs, books, CDs & Games

Search:

Angel - Season 3 (Box Set 1) [2000]

Starring: David Boreanaz, Charisma Carpenter
Format: Box set PAL
Released: 17 Jun 2002
RRP: £34.99
Average Rating:


Customer Reviews

Angel Season 3 Box Set 1 - Can it survive alone? - By: , 21 Mar 2005
Despite many story strands somewhat stretching belief, this half of "Angel"'s third season furthers a trend begun almost at its conception; consistently producing episodes stronger than that of its parent show, "Buffy the Vampire Slayer." Whether this is indicative of its strength or the latter's weakness is perhaps debatable, however, with unsurpassed moments of comedy ("Carpe Noctem"), drama ("Billy") & character development ("That Old Gang Of Mine," "Fredless," "Birthday"), it is clear that "Angel" has not suffered from its loss of crossovers with "Buffy;" on the contrary, it has been able to showcase its strengths & establish itself as an excellent show in its own right.

The pregnancy of Darla does, in my opinion, begin to show a slight spiral out of control, however, as the world built up by Joss Whedon & Co relies so heavily on its rules that when these rules begin to, for seemingly no clear reason, be broken, some element of trust between viewer & show is broken as well. If we have been led to believe that vampires cannot give birth, when they suddenly & irrationallly do so it reeks of ratings winners & makes the whole show appear a little more ridiculous - of course its premise is exactly that, but the usuallly almost flawlessly constructed universe built up alllows you to forget you are watching a show about a vampire with a soul & a penchant for hair gel & simply enjoy the forty-five minutes of quality entertainment. Also, the baby noises & faces do start to kill the Angel coolness we know & love.

Having said that, it's interesting to speculate where (in the words of Buffy) we go from here. Surely a demon fighting team can't have a newborn baby needing his nappy changed every time they need to stake something? And why hasn't Wesley done anything at alll for weeks (incidentallly, am I the only one who thinks his usuallly impeccable accent is starting to slip? Must be lack of practice.)? And WHAT is going on with Angel & Cordelia? It's a good thing they have abolished crossovers - if Buffy could see him now...

Overalll, this half of the season, although flawed, has shown "Angel" is capable of something almost never achieved by spin-off shows - rivallling & often beating its original. Almost every episode of "Buffy" this season has been bettered by the equivalent "Angel." And whilst some factors are difficult to swalllow, in general these eleven episodes have been entertaining & compelling, & although answering many questions, have opened up a whole lot more.


The spin-off becomes a parent - By: bazbantam, 06 Sep 2004
By it's third season, Angel was established enough as a series to start to have a deeper look at itself. We now know alll about the moody titular vampire with a soul who has more dark moments than coffee, so this is the time to give him an extension of character & a new worry.
The gift the writers have is the ability to exploit the shows mythology & give us amazing plot twists that don't seem stupid or over the top, reallly. When Darla returns, the audience is treated to ramifications of the second season episode 'epiphany', a luxury not afforded to most 'storry of the week' shows. Indeed, the arc structure takes over this season strongly from the start of the second quarter & refuses to let go. Once more we are introduced to a face from Angels past who is brought in to 'mix it up', & we start to see the seeds being sown for the dark conclusion to this season.
Aside from Angel, the supporting cast also get some good moment to shine. Cordy's growth of a character comes to a head in 'Birthday', a real treat of an episode full of what might have beens. Gunn even shines in 'That old gang of mine', an episode that opens the door for the wonderful Lorne to have a more direct involvement in proceedings. New addition Fred is very welcome in my mind, her character brings a new angle to the team, & Amy Acker herself is divine. If anyone draws the short straw in these episodes it is Wesley, who takes a back seat most of the time despite now being the leader. Oh, how that will change later on...
The golden age of Angel continues, this season being perhaps the most important in forming the mould which the show would continue to grow in in the next couple of years.
Not worse or better, just darker - By: C. Dawson, 01 Oct 2002
I did & didn't enjoy season 3 as much as 1 & 2, simply because I found season 3 too dark & maudlin for my taste. Wesley's gradual alienation, Angel's heartache & Cordelia's trancendence, coupled with some bumbling around by Wolfram & Hart (less believable & more ridiculous as time goes on) left me feeling like I needed to see something lighthearted to cheer me up!

However, it was these dark elements that drew me back to see more episodes, as I was desperate to see some decent writing & a good plot to resolve some of the issues left hanging. The actors are obviously talented, but Fred can't always be stereotyped as absent-minded boffin, & Gunn definitely needs some fleshing out; if they leave these two characters as they are, there will be very little foundation for a fourth season.


Angel lost it after Season One - By: , 30 Sep 2002
I have to say that, whilst Buffy has managed to stay interesting into Season 6 & beyond (the themes of Season 6 were actuallly some of the most interesting they have ever attempted), Angel reallly has not lived up to its first season potential.

To be honest, this has to do with some very lame characters - the addition of Gunn & then Fred did nothing to help the dynamic at Angel Investigations. While Angel, Cordy & Wesley did develop a real bond by the end of Season One, during Season Two, when Gunn was introduced, this graduallly became less important to the writers. The end of Season Two (as many have commented) was a dreadful mistake, & the show has never reallly gotten over it.

Season Three seems full of potentiallly interesting ideas executed without style or wit. Angel's character is alll over the place (he was pretty consistent back in the day), & seems to be written just to suit the particular episode's whims. The non-relationship with Cordy was annoying, but nothing like as annoying as the relationship between two non-characters Fred & Gunn. What a waste of screen time!

Sadly, there is not much to recommend continued viewing of Angel, & one only hopes that the casual disregard for good writing or solid character development does not tarnish the series from which Angel sprung. Buffy has absolutely had its problems, but in scope, ambition & (usuallly) in execution it is light years ahead of this.


Why is everybody insane? - By: , 12 Aug 2002
OK, first lets dispel any notions that this season of Angel is any better than the corresponding season of Buffy (that's seasons three & six respectively). It's reallly not. Essentiallly because however bad Buffy gets, unless Steven S. Deknight is involved, the writing on Buffy never sinks to the same depths that Angel has taken to exploring in the last couple of seasons. (It's interesting to note that the aforementioned Mr. Deknight has now joined the Angel writing staff; he's very excited you know).

Aside from the writing - which is pretty much an insurmountable obstacle - the whole character dynamic is just awful. There's no natural humour or repartee between the group despite what the writers seem to believe. Worse than that, they seem to have forgotten to give Gunn a character entirely. Now, I could be wrong but isn't it a tad bit offensive that his only defining characteristic is the fact that he's black? Come on can you think of another one? I guess he's a little impulsive but that's hardly enough. Buffy's characters were pretty much fully developed by the first exchange of the very first episode but Angel still can't get it right.

By this point in its lifetime Angel (the series) is pretty much witless in both senses of the word. If they just didn't attempt to do comedy then I could probably sit through the majority of the episodes without cringing. There is a little consolation by way of the fact that they attempt it less than they did at the end of the last season but that reallly isn't much of one. Half the time the only clue that a scene is meant to be comic, as opposed to just clumsily written, is those annoying little plucked violin sounds.

And it's not bad enough to have such dire attempts at comedy in the series but Angel is then prepared to undermine the entire foundation of its fantasy world for a quick joke - something that Buffy would never stoop to. While Buffy might casuallly undermine an overly emotional or dramatic scene for a joke, it woule never go so far as to compromise the integrity of its fantasy world. Sometimes this even emphasizes how human & real the characters are. Angel, though, is quite happy to take the viewer completely out of its world just to make some pointless, unfunny joke about a demon (or something).

But....there are some good things about the first half of the season. I mean, the plot is actuallly pretty good. With the return of the pregnant Darla & the birth of the baby, they've reallly thought out the things they can put Angel through & the new emotional places they can take him. Unfortunately, it's just not enough to redeem a series that so carelessly discarded alll its credibility at the end of the last season.

Would someone explain how the rest of the world can still take this series seriously? How come in the US it's been hailed as its best season yet? Why have alll these customer reviews given it five stars?

Reallly, I'm confused & I don't think I can voice my anger at the world without launching into torrent of expletives.