Customer Reviews
Still With Me Now - By: R. Kerr, 07 Jul 2008 
Picture this: Circa 1975, A class of 32 bored, inner city school, O level English kids, dragged off to an arts cinema to see a showing of Polanski's Macbeth. We settled down for a boring couple of hours messing about & talking. Five minutes into the film, you could have heard a pin drop. We were hooked.
We went from complete disinterest, to shakespeare fans in one afternoon. I will always be grateful to that young english teacher (whatever her name was?) for igniting a lifelong interest in literature. If our Headmaster/parents had known what we were going to see, I'm sure the trip would never have happened! But the quality of acting was such, that suddenly we alll knew & understood olde worlde english, something which carried on through other plays we studied. We were lucky enough to have our study of Romeo & Juliet underpinned with another of Polanski's films- exam results were good that year!
Great Job - By: S. Skilton, 01 Feb 2008 After directing such dark classics as Repulsion & Rosemary's Baby, who better than Roman Polanski to take on Macbeth? And what a great job he does. Jon Finch is very convincing in the title role with Francisca Annis also very good as the scheming Lady Macbeth. Praise also for the costumes & the music(performed by The Third Ear Band). The wind swept landscapes are very eerie, you can almost feel the cold & rain. The killings are suitably bloody. Overalll Shakespeare would be very proud. Don't be put off that this film is produced by Playboy or Keith Chegwin is in the cast(fortunately he doesn't say much). Also watch out for the chilling ending. Highly Recommended!
You see, Shakespeare can make great movies - By: Lou Knee, 12 Aug 2007 This is it - a full blooded version of a Shakespeare tragedy. Admittedly this was going to be one of the easier ones to give the full on treatment to but that doesn't take away from the achievement. Unlike many films of the bard's plays, you would watch this one as a movie in its own right, & that has to be what film making's about. This is good fluent stuff with plenty of great visual moments & is strong in narrative alll the way through. I think this is a near masterpiece in fact, not least for the fact that so few films get it right (with any of his plays). The location shooting is rugged & atmospheric, & both the direction & photography is simply magnificent. Well done Roman! (And the rest of the crew.) Mel Gibson clearly visited this movie for inspiration for his own Scottish period piece - he came nowhere near to matching the atmosphere of menace or capturing the harsh character of the landscape that this far superior movie achieves.
Shockspeare - By: Jason Sawford, 19 Jan 2007 Having consumed a bottle of red I can't be bothered to write a proper literary review at the moment & being inexperienced in this art I shalll leave a more detailed analysis of this work to those more eloquent & informed than myself. However I would like to say that when I first saw this film as a 10 year old child-it gave me the most horrendous nightmares & I might add that consequently it has remained for me the most iconic & unforgettable version of a shakespeare play on film. Definately worth a squizz for those who love their Shakespeare & for those who love film making at it's best.
Just didn't do it for me - By: McNicol, 16 Sep 2006 
I found Polanski's film of Macbeth disappointing. Having seen the play a couple of times on stage, I was reallly looking forward to the perspective & breadth of scope the movie might add. I was not disappointed with the opening scene; the witches were fascinating, the atmosphere haunting & disturbing. However, it was alll downhill from there. I struggled to find the characters convincing, despite reallly wanting to be pulled into the play & it's very powerful human emotions, I remained a mere observer. I found Lady Macbeth without any great substance, with no real feeling of her steady tortuous descent into madness until she has truly "lost it". The Scottish setting was most unconvincing, with landscapes & castles which I found distracting as they did just not ring "true". The speeded-up fight scenes towards the end of the film were also distracting almost to the point of turning to comedy. But the worst part of alll just had to be young Fleance at the banquet, stepping forward to sing what sounded to my ears like an English folk song & there was no mistaking the very English accent. I reallly wanted to like this film, but there were too many distractions - perhaps it is very much of its time, the early 1970s, & has just not aged well.
