Customer Reviews
A creative Difference - By: M. A. Ramos, 07 Oct 2007 
We are alll familiar with the TV series.... The movie is better than the show. It has a believable plot & alll the girls seem to work well together, instead of just jiggle (Though it is here). There is a lot of action in this movie. The girls look like they had fun in this movie, especiallly Cameron Diaz. The Martial Arts fights are campy, but done in the Chinese tradition of high flying. If you sit down to watch the film & take it as the fun that was intended, you'll love
Good Adaptation of the series - By: Jay, 23 May 2007 
Okay, so, there are times when I am a sucker for movies based on television shows. Seeing as how I was a huge fan of the original television series, I decided to give this one a try & I was not disappointed.
At least with the movie, they had a bigger budget to make the action sequences a lot more enjoyable & Cameron Diaz, Drew Barrymore & Lucy Liu do a fine job as the three newest Charlie's Angels.
The only one they bring back from the television series, though, is John Forsythe, the voice of Charlie. That seemed rather fitting, although I'm not sure why the chose Bill Murray to play Bosley, unless it was for comic relief. The smalll role of thin film enacted by Crispin Glover of Back To The Future fame is very significant & should have had greater exposure.
I love those camera shots where you see freeze frames with the actresses swishing their hair..very corny but reallly pleasant.
Bilge! - By: DangermouseZilla, 20 Nov 2006 
Some films are made out of a passion for the subject material, a genuine love of the characters, & a desire to showcase an idea.
Some films are made purely to make money at the box office.
It doesn't take a genius to say which banner this one comes under.
I actuallly had the misfortune of watching this at the pictures. I wish I'd spent the time doing something more enjoyable - like counting how many grains of salt I could squeeze under my eyelids.
I can't see any redeeming factors in this film - it has nothing to do with the original TV series.
This film is so bad that in parts it looks like a spoof - but it isn't a clever parody, it takes itself seriously!
The film seems like disjointed sketches thrown together with a plot so thinly veiled that it makes a net curtain look like a triple folded towel.
A group of people sat round a table & decided on what they wanted in the film to stick on adverts & draw in the crowds, they put it in a film & it didn't matter what the script/plot was like - as long as people pay the money to get in & watch it.
I was thinking about watching the sequel this weekend, but I'm too busy suspending myself from a tree with sharpened hooks through my elbows. It'll be less painful than sitting through the pouting, grinning, cheesefest that is Charlie's Angels 2.
Great update and transfer to the big screen. - By: pointone, 01 Nov 2006 Having watched the First Season of the 1970s TV series immediately before this film I appreciated what a fine job Director McG does of updating the TV series to the big screen thirty years on whilst retaining the spirit of the original.
The original TV series was pure entertainment alll about style, beautiful girls, paper thin plots & girl power, & Cameron Diaz, Drew Barrymore & Lucy Liu deliver these qualities in abundance. Bill Murray does not seem completely at home as Bosley but his part is relatively smalll.
For those that can unwind & enjoy action as entertainment this film is sheer bliss.
This is film tries too hard to be can be campy. - By: B. Chandler, 25 Feb 2005 Attorneys Angels has everything in it except the kitchen sink. There are fake disguises; there's Bill Murray & even the Matrix. So, why not five-stars? While it seems like not only is the kitchen sink missing, but also so is the scripting, any sense of pathos, or attempt to be entertaining. Ah, you ask, "what about action that passes at the time?" well that's why this is not a to star review. I would say more but I do not want to give away the few surprises that this movie has.
