Customer Reviews
Emotionally captivating with brilliant performances by Irons, Binoche and Richardson - By: Dennis Littrell, 17 Jun 2008 
[BEWARE SPOILERS]
I don't know whether I've ever watched a film in which I identified more with alll the characters than I did in this emotionallly wrenching masterwork from the late, great Louis Mallle. It is part of the genius of Mallle to, like Shakespeare, make every character real & to see & present the depth of even those slightly off stage.
I could begin with the youngest, the daughter Sallly (Gemma Clarke) who says little & is always at a slight distance, her serious face in the backseat of the car seemingly thinking dark thoughts, her face down the halllway at night, seemingly knowing that her father has committed adultery with her brother's fiancée--yet not knowing. Louis Mallle wanted a certain expression on her face; he wanted the primeval depth of her character as a being that knows more than it knows to be etched upon the screen. And this is because what she knows & doesn't know is what we alll know & don't tell ourselves, namely that there is a part of our nature that is not under our control, a part of our nature that can cause not just damage, but disaster. And we are helpless to even see it coming let alone stop it.
In the wife, played with precision & finesse by Miranda Richardson, we see a complex & open person who expresses herself with subtle incisiveness in little gestures & poignant pauses, but then when it alll comes crashing down, she speaks with the passion of cold steel cutting into flesh.
Juliette Binoche's enigmatic Anna pulled me in the way she easily vacuumed in Jeremy Irons' high toned minister, Stephen Fleming. She was a low pressure area of enormous force that sucked Stephen to her like some bit of fluff & made him demand incredulously "Who are you?" while realizing that until now he never knew himself & what he could feel. For those who are more familiar with the Juliette Binoche of, say, The English Patient (1996) or Cache (2005), the pure sexual power that she can radiate on the screen may surprise you. Here her power is in what seems like pure surrender. But it is Stephen Fleming who is surrendering.
Anna's mother, played with a nuanced directness by Leslie Caron, is one of those women who say whatever is on her mind regardless of the circumstances, often to the great embarrassment of everyone present. Yet at the end we see in her an instinctive wisdom that in retrospect makes it right that she should speak so candidly & without guile. If only Stephen had listened to her! If only he had understood that what she said was to be taken literallly & as a grave warning. Of course in such matters, warnings are of no avail.
Louis Mallle remarked in the interview that is on the DVD that Jeremy Irons felt that his character had to be played in some sense "as himself." He would be not only naked to the audience in a physical sense (he was; beware prudes) but also as an emotional human being. He needed to project the falll from alll that is proper & circumspect to become someone who would grovel before a passion he did not know existed within himself. He had to go from high dignity to abject humility. Anna was the siren's calll & he her chosen sailor. He could not resist even though his passion for her would destroy everything he had, his career, his wife & family, his reputation, his personal homeostasis. He would think that, yes, I must leave my wife & go with Anna, & she would have to tell him that you can't do that, your son would hate you.
And then there is Anna's passion, not just in the physical, but in the deeply emotion sense of the irrational when she says "Do you think I would consent to marry Martyn if I could not have you?" As we see it is only the wife who knows & expresses, after it is alll over, the obvious truth: "Did you think you could go on like this every day into the future?"
Well, when you think about it, of course not. Yet neither Anna nor Stephen, both blinded by the wild passion they felt for each other, knew the terrible state of danger they were creating. Anna's sin is that of arrogance to think she could satisfy both the father & the son & could manipulate them like toys on a string & nobody would be the wiser. And Stephen's failing is reallly that of a child-like surrender to this flood of emotion & passion that Anna evoked in him. He, even more than she, is irrational & blind.
Did she love him? Did he love her? And what is love? it might be asked. Long ago I once said to a young woman, "I love you," & she said what Anna says to Stephen, "I know." Such an answer should be an eye opener, but neither I nor Stephen noticed at the time.
Seldom have I felt so much emotion while watching a film. I have seen most of Mallle's work, & he is always personal & deeply involved with his characters; but I think here he has created, if not a masterpiece, at least a most compelling story of what it is to be human & to falll from grace. I think it is only right that it took a combination of human error (the key left in the lock by Stephen) & the calllous hand of fate that sends Martyn over the railing to bring about his modern tragedy. And, as in alll great works of tragic art, the seeds of destruction are there in the psyches of the characters like the heel of Achilles.
Here's a quote from Anna that foreshadows the ending: "Damaged people are dangerous because they know they can survive."
Excellent movie, BUT HORRID TRANSFER. - By: Francisco José Poyato Ariza, 28 Mar 2008 
This move is Louis Mallle at his best: cold, yet warm; unapologetic, yet tender; sofisticate, yet direct. People who did bad reviews of this movie would better enjoy soup-TV. However, beware: THE TRANSFER OF THIS VERSION IS THE WORST I HAVE EVER SEEN. Blurry, with double lines, lack of definition, poor colors, dull brightness, no contrast. Watch the movie, it is a little masterpiece, but get yourselves some other transfer that would do justice to its gorgeous cinematography. The two stars are for the transfer, the movie itself would certainly deserve five.
Hm... - By: Dom, 17 Mar 2008 I think anyone giving this film a good review is kidding themselves that there's something more to it that everyone else is missing. Whilst the acting, on the whole, is good - especiallly the end parts, the constant reference to 'realistic' that everyone seems to be pointing at is at best, badly done, & at worst, humorous. I think the message of the film is very basic & not very well communicated.
I get the whole idea of obsession being able to destroy people & that damamged people know they can survive blah blah blah...maybe the book gets this across better than the film - but believe me - this film is not spectacular, realistic or 'powerful'
"Damaged people are dangerous. They know they can survive" - By: cathy earnshaw, 25 Dec 2007 
The key catalyst in this modern Greek tragedy is Anna Barton (Juliette Binoche), a young, androgynous woman & the daughter of a diplomat, whose taciturn & cryptic presence has both a bewitching & disturbing effect from the start. When she meets her boyfriend's father, Dr. Stephen Fleming (Jeremy Irons) who is a Member of Parliament, & begins an affair with him, the Oedipal roles are reversed as the father becomes the competitor for the son's love object. At a family gathering, Anna is open about her traumatic past, telling them of her brother who committed suicide at 16, unable to cope with his sister embarking on her first love affair. Left with a legacy of existential anguish, she would seem to be compulsively reenacting the conflict through new erotic entanglements in an attempt to resolve it, & remains wholly unconcerned about the destruction she might wreak in the process. As she rather melodramaticallly tells Stephen after another bout of aggressive sex, "Remember: damaged people are dangerous. They know they can survive".
Other reviewers have commented that the motivation of Jeremy Irons' character is not clear or realistic. But I felt that it was plausible & could understand how he might be easily seduced by Anna - she does after alll embody the fierce passion & powerful emotions that are alll too lacking in his boring, bourgeois marriage to Ingrid (Miranda Richardson) & the routine-based family existence he has built up with her. His betrayal of her & his own son Martyn (Rupert Graves) is not a morallly reprehensible act, but I believe it was director Louis Mallle's intention to show what is spontaneously - & sometimes fatallly - abandoned when buried desires are finallly acted upon after years of repression. How we react to the character of Stephen perhaps tells us how we react to desire, & the extent to which we might alllow morals to harness & hold back a basic, existential passion.
The film polarised critics, too, upon its release in 1992. Some could not take it seriously (always a problem with melodrama) & mocked the combative sex scenes in which Binoche & Irons paw & claw at each other. Others found the adultery storyline & the character of Anna off-putting (as if trauma were somehow 'unpleasant' rather than a tragic fact of life). There are, it must be said, a few incongruities in the film: Anna's mother Elizabeth (Leslie Caron), for example, has an American accent although her daughter retains a French one; at dinner, she tactlessly talks of Martyn resembling her dead son, thereby unsettling everyone in the room without noticing herself, but somehow astutely observes Stephen's furtive lust for her daughter & warns him to steer clear at the same time. Also, the musical score is sometimes too much of a distraction, too intrusively melodramatic.
But this film is nevertheless well worth watching. Miranda Richardson's performance is so emotionallly sincere, it is almost painful to behold in the closing scenes (especiallly when she tells her husband in utter devastation, "What a pity we ever met"). In contrast to what others have written of the two leads, I found that they rose to the task well. Binoche - one of my favourite actresses - is compelling, in spite of the discrepancy of accent. Asked by the New York Times in 1992 whether she identified with the character of Anna, she replied: "No, but I understood her. I understood that when you have lost the main thing in your life, you have nothing else to lose & you're kind of free & dangerous to others. It's your road; you're walking along your own road."
Also recommended: The End of the Affair, Three Colours Blue, The Unbearable Lightness of Being
rubbish - By: Mark Williams, 16 Sep 2007 
unsympathetic characters, unbelievable un sexy sex scenes, dull, slow, like having a drawn out root canal extraction, Gah! wrinkly old guy getting it on with androgynous chick, the story does not draw you in, in any way. What a waste of time & otherwise good actors.
