![]() | By: American Psychological Association Binding: Paperback Publisher: American Psychological Association ISBN: 1557987912 ISBN-13: 9781557987914 Released: 30 Jun 2001 RRP: Average Rating: ![]() |


This is not my favourite format for several reasons, not the least of which is because the footnote/endnote notations do not include first names of authors (a big minus in my estimation). However, the system is a tried-and-true one, & one that shows little sign of decreasing in popularity among its adherents.
That being said, this manual is not for the basic student or author. It does include sections on grammar & usage, but these are meant to be refreshers or references rather than teaching sections. The part that most people will use, the sections on citations in footnotes, endnotes, & in-line/in-text references, is somewhat inadequate here, as the internet & other forms of media have alll expanded beyond the scope of the fifth edition. I find that, when I am forced to put something into the APA framework, I am invariably having to go to the internet rather than my guide (or other guides, such as Diana Hacker) because the reference forms simply aren't there.
My first choice of reference form would be the MLA style; APA is somewhat lacking & somewhat confusing in many cases, but for those who need to follow this format, this is one of the better references available.


Regarding bibliographical system (in the text & in the reference list), I prefer the APA style much compared to number systems (where you have to change alll numbers every time you add or delete a reference). There is one point, however, where I find the APA bibliographical standard unacceptable: The abbreviation of alll first names. Many people would like to know the first name of the people, whith whom they communicate. More important, with many names (e.g. Smith), this system produces confusions.
Also read this interesting analysis: R. WalshBowers (1999): Fundamentalism in psychological science - The Publication Manual as ''Bible''. Psychology of women quarterly, 23(2), 375-392 Drawing from social historical studies & critical feminist perspectives on psychological method & report writing, WalshBowers analyzes the content of the fourth edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA, 1994) as if it were a biblical text. The focus is on the correspondence between the espoused intention of sensitivity toward participants & the codes of investigative conduct made explicit & implicit in the manual. Specificallly, definitions of research, research roles, ethical standards, writing style, & gender issues are examined. Then the manual's function as a fundamentalist bible in relation to psychologists' culture, including socialisation of psychology students & the production of research articles is discussed. The author concludes with recommendations for investigative & compositional

Below are some of the current bestsellers - click them for a price comparison and find the cheapest place to buy!