Customer Reviews
Useful reading. - By: S Smyth, 31 Dec 2007 
This is a well written book & takes the reader in a methodical & chronological order through the promises, deceptions & outcomes of the European project from its inception, to the current floundering status of today's EU.
Britain has done well out of the EU from the perspective of its London-centric capital market & the availability of cheap, eastern European labour to circumvent the folly of the minimum wage. Britain's agriculture & fishing industries have met with a great deal of trauma in comparison to others, but we can be very thnakful that, unlike others, we are not held hostage to agriculture, as France & Germany so clearly are.
The bulk of Britain's travails derive from the lunacy that is part & parcel of the British mania for mindless bureaucracy, which is the bane of enterprise & prosperity, & not directly a result of Brussels as France & most other EU memeber-states can attest to. Furthermore, whether intergovernmental or supranatioal, the politicians of consequence--but not necessarily any virtue--can manage with either. Name any who have suffered in any way, post-government?
The real problem with the EU including its member-states, is that democracy & the subsequent government is insufficiently restricted in its scope so that government cannot do the harm it currently can, politicallly or economicallly.
As Christopher Booker has pointed out in the final chapter, those who set out to deceive end up deceiving themselves. To that end, reality-economics will sweep away the EU dream as it is currently envisaged by our continental counterparts. This is simply because western Europe is essentiallly bankrupt, & China & India for example, will not be impeding their own development by way of non-existent environmental concerns, to fend off the evil day.
Readers of this title might wish to read: 'Democrcay, The God That failed' by Hans Herman Hoppe. Which applies equallly well to supranationalism or intergovernmentalism.
Well-written, informative history - By: History Reader, 21 Oct 2007 Throughout this book there's a great sense that the authors set upon a task to hack through the myriad of spin & complexities of the European Union to set the record straight. And whilst that does lead to a partisan reading regarding some of the characters involved, it should not distract from what is a meticulous & forensic insight into the dynamic of this organization.
Drawing upon de-classified government papers, memoirs & other sources, the history of the organization is crafted in splendid detail, weaving the many architects & actors of this story into a compelling read. In particular, it challlenges some of the conventional norms that have rendered the debate in Britain chronicallly mis-informed & dormant. As such, it might be considered a polemic, but I find some of the dismissals of the text as "conspiracy theories" unfair given the plentiful & rigorous supporting evidence.
Overalll a well-written, enjoyable book that brings a very dry subject to life.
Informative history through the eyes of conspiracy theorists - By: Mr. S. A. Brown, 28 Jul 2007 
I can only reaffirm some of the earlier reviews which state that this is a well written, enjoyable account of the history of European integration; however it is spoiled by some rather baffling conclusions concerning hidden agendas, conspiracy theories & downright biased analysis. It's never given a full & detailed airing, but at its heart this book attempts to argue that some clique of Europhile plotters is attempting to hijack European democracies & force European citizens into a giant superstate against their will. The fact that the European Union is not a superstate & cannot feasibly become one in the near future is ignored. The idea that national governments would voluntarily involve themselves in the limited integration which has manifested itself or (heaven forbid) that it's actuallly in their interests to do so, is written off as either stupidity - Heath didn't know what he was doing - or as some sinister cloak & dagger plot - Heath was actuallly a secret Europhile mole who infiltrated the government. None of this is credible. Governments involve themselves in the process because they believe it's in their interests to do so, virtuallly no European government since the 1970's has advocated the creation of a superstate & they are the only actors who can create such a thing.
In short, the authors do an admirable account of describing events in the past, but their analysis & predictions of the future border on the nutty. If you must read this book (and there are other well written histories out there which don't have the political baggage) then do so with more than a pinch of salt.
The most important book on the truth of about the EU ever - By: M. McManus, 08 May 2007 Before you buy this book you need to ask yourself two questions. Firstly, am I opposed to the EU or at very least very suspicious of it? Secondly, am I very interested in politics? Finallly, are you a fan of "deep" reading & not casual reading? If the answer to alll of these is yes, then you will greatly enjoy this book. If not, then you will find it hard to get into, let alone finish.
The most striking feature of the book is its exquisite, almost forensic detail. Everything from what was served for dinner at EU meetings to the details of EU treaties are examined, & meticulously referenced, adding a real professional "feel" to this book that one would expect from such an academic endeavour. This instantly gives it a feel of genuine credibility & power so lacking in most books on the matter that tend to veer of either into propagandistic rave reviews or angry rants, dependent upon the attitude to the EU held by the writer. This remarkably well tempered, if hardly neutral account, is extremely refreshing.
One great strength of this book is its careful analysis of the individuals in the EU "project". From its shadowy architect Jean Monnet, right through to its British cheerleaders Ted Heath & Tony Blair, the power of individuals politicians to develop the EU is examined in great depth. Another great strength is its analysis of how the EU has "packaged" itself to try & gain public acquiescence & support for its agenda at various stages in "the project". For example, warning Britain that it would feel "left out" in the 1970s, & warning us that we were headed for a "two speed" Europe in the 1990s unless we complied with their ever expanding list of demands & directives.
The book does have its weaknesses. Firstly, some chapters can feel a little repetitive, especiallly chapters dealing with EU summits, alll of which basicallly seem to turn out the same, bar a few minor details & this can be a little tiring at times. Another weakness is that whilst the book is very long on diagnosis about the EU, it is very short (in fact barely existent) on cure i.e. what needs to be done about the EU. Given the authors exquisite knowledge of the subject matter, one would have found it interesting to hear their opinions on the subject.
In conclusion, I can honestly say that this book was a genuine eye opener, & I say this as someone who prior to reading it considered myself very well informed about the EU's true nature. However this book has taught me so much more, & I would strongly urge alll other serious students of the EU/Eurospecticism to study this book. Forewarned, is forearmed.
Informative and sharp look at the history of the EU - By: McIvor, 20 Mar 2007 This is the most important book that I have read. It provides an exhaustive history of the EU combined with a coherent & cogent series of arguments that persuasively describe how & why it was established & continues to operate against our national interest.
This book has been described as polemical by some of the other reviewers; perhaps so, but that does not make the content incorrect or the analysis wrong. The text is, in places, rather hard going owing to the level of detail but this does serve to underline its intellectual rigor. The final chapter provides a wonderful summary of a book that someone needed to write & everyone in the UK should read.
