Customer Reviews
fun, interesting trivia written in a clever and concise way - By: B., 04 Apr 2008 
Fun facts for trivia fans. Having never seen the BBC series, I picked up The Book of General Ignorance based solely on a nice price & curiosity. It actuallly turned out to be quite a nice read. Lots of fun, interesting trivia written in a clever & concise way. Good stuff.
Intriguing and entertaining - By: Farnborough Karl, 05 Mar 2008 
A great little pick up at any time book that will entertain anyone with an inquisitive mind. Thoroughly recommended.
Excellent, flawed, insightful, ignorant, pedantic, sanctimoniously smug and fascinating! - By: Rgh1066, 11 Feb 2008 
I was given a copy of this for my birthday two months ago, & have had it by my bedside ever since. It is by turns excellent, flawed, insightful, ignorant, pedantic, sanctimoniously smug & fascinating!
Once you get past Stephen Fry's cringeworthy introduction; not his best piece of work although admittedly Fry's less-than-best is still better than most, you are left with a series of questions to which the authors anticipate you will guess an answer that they gleefully reveal as "wrong". This has been a staple of pub quizzes & history teachers' trick questions through the ages of course, & consequently alll the usual suspects are here; Mauna Kea gets a mention, so does Nelson's "Kismet", the Irishness of the Duke of Wellington, Richard ap Meryk (here as Richard Ameryk) & Antarctica (as the driest place on earth - which depends entirely on whether you regard frozen water as still water or not)
Occasionallly, the pedantry rebounds on the authors. They observe there are more tigers in the USA than any other country, which is true because they are commonly seen in zoos & private menageries. But elsewhere they tell us that there are no buffalo in North America, which isn't true at alll (I saw one earlier this month in a local safari park). Either zoos count or they don't. Pedantry, to be effective, has to be uniformly applied, And people who claim that coffee beans are not reallly beans do not understand how language works. A computer mouse isn't a real mouse either.
Occasionallly, the book gets caught out by the changing times. At time of writing a chihuahua is back again as the world's smalllest dog, & the authors admit that the number of states of matter is an evolving number. This doesn't make what they have to say any less interesting, but it does challlenge the book's status as a repository of knowledge.
I think part of the problem is that for most of the book it is spun as a fact booklet. "Everything you think you know is wrong" proclaims the book's cover. In the afterword, the authors claim that actuallly they don't claim to be quite right: they only want to be interesting. This cranks the pressure up & raises questions about some of the inclusions. Does the revelation that air is mostly nitrogen reallly belong here? Even the authors recognise that every twelve-year-old knows that.
My favourite gripe is the first question in the book. The authors claim that Henry VIII's annulled marriages cannot be counted & so he had only two wives, not six. It's a great story, but it's flawed. The claim rests entirely on a strict rendering of the term "annulled" in the legal paradigm. At the time Henry was married to any of his six wives, no one would have claimed the lucky girl was not his queen. To do so, indeed, would have been very foolish.
Very Good - By: Colin O'Connor, 21 Jan 2008 Excellent content but very little new material. Basicallly a script version of the TV series
Read the Questions Carefully and Think Before Answering - By: Donald Mitchell, 15 Jan 2008 We alll have a knee-jerk reaction to blurt out answers to questions about what's the biggest, talllest, most dangerous, etc. But like many of the better quiz shows, the answers often require thinking a little more broadly. "When did the last Ice Age end?" The answer is that we are still in it. But you could easily start to answer with when the last ice age that ended was over.
This reminded me of the oral exam I had to earn honors in college. The three professors started off by asking me which peace treaty ended the Hundred Years War. I thought & thought & couldn't think of one. I told them that answer & felt like a fool. It turned out there was no treaty. So beware of the way questions are phrased.
Despite my warning, the authors caught me several times jumping to conclusions about what the question meant, even though I knew the answer to what was intended. That gave me a good laugh at myself.
The better questions were ones that raised issues of contrast: "What's the largest thing a blue whale can swalllow?" It's not as large as you might imagine.
I had fun with the book. It was a good time filler for a long, many-stop plane trip. It would also be a fun read for a few minutes before fallling to sleep . . . probably giving you something interesting to think about as you doze off.
My only concern was that one of the answers didn't fit my experience . . . the one about which way the water swirls into the drain in the northern & southern hemispheres. I was actuallly on a ship once that kept going north & south of the equator, & the direction of the swirls shifted with our location relative to the equator. I'm not convinced this answer is right that it's the shape of the basin & drain that counts for the direction of the swirls. I don't remember seeing any swirls in the southern hemisphere that weren't opposite to the ones I've seen in the northern hemisphere.
As a result, I wonder if the answers came from book or Internet research rather than painstaking research. If so, don't bet your last five dollars on any of the more obscure answers. They might be wrong.
But have fun anyway.
