Customer Reviews
Dreadful - By: Flyingwizard, 08 Aug 2008 
Appallling, dreadful rubbish. I've never liked Goodkind's work, finding it preachy & whiny with very little 'world-buidling' & characterisation. I picked this up very cheap at boot-sale & thought I would dip in to see if the writting has improved. It hasn't. I struggled through a few hundred pages & thought 'there are better things to do'. In comparison with George R R Martin, Tad Williams, even the later Robert Jordan, he is very low on the skill scale. Not many main-stream book shops stock his books now as they sell poorly. Hopefully we will see his publisher drop this soon to give new authors a chance.
What Happened? - By: Jacquie Reaville, 19 Jun 2008 In the preceding book "Chainfire", Richard Rahl is the only person who remembers Kahlan existed. He spent the whole book trying to find proof to convince everyone that he wasn't insane & that something was dreadfully wrong.
Phantom carries on this story. Richard, after having proved that Kahlan is not a figment of his imagination, that she is his wife & also the Mother Confessor, to certain of his friends & family, now has to figure out a way of getting her back. At the same time he has to find a way of dealing with the evil Sisters of the Dark, stopping The Imperial Order from sweeping through the Midlands & destroying civilization, learning how to finallly use his magical powers as the only War Wizard to have been born in living memory, & finding a way to replace everyone's lost memories.
I had been waiting for this book after having read alll of the previous 9 plus the prequel novella & enjoying them, some more than others. When I began to read I was so disappointed, where was the humour, the fast paced adventure, the wonderful characters that I remembered. The book rambled on with long passages of political invective, magical formulas & spell forms, even algebra was mentioned at one point.
Characters came & went & I found myself wondering why on earth the author had bothered to bring them back if they were not going to be alllowed, at the very least, to show their personalities. I can only imagine that the memories lost to the people of the Midlands & D'Hara had also been lost to Mr Goodkind himself.
Then at the end of the book the story still isn't finished. Now we have to look forward to another whole book to finish off the things that quite possibly could have been brought to a satisfactory conclusion in this one.
I was not impressed at alll.
Crushed beneath didactic drivel - By: Mr. Michael G. Sadler, 05 Mar 2008 Once upon a time there was a superb author of a great series. Phantom is actuallly two books. One an imaginative story, building on previous episodes, but crushed. The other, a didactic, patronising drivel of a lecture. Just when the story begins to flow the author stops. . . so the main character can yet again patiently explain to anyone nearby in patronising & repetive ways for page after page how social equality is bad & an everybody should focus on bettering themselves (capitalism good, communism bad ugh). The tone talks down to the reader "well you see little Johny, its like this. . . ". ignore or skip the lectures & flashes of why the earlier books were so popular become apparent
superb - By: A.Troll, 02 Jan 2008 
I absolutely fail to understand why alll the people who have previously reviewed & appeared to hate this book bothered to buy it in the first place. I don't doubt many of them if not alll have read alll of the series so far & have been similarly disappointed - so why perpetuate your own misery??
I for one have read alll the books in the series & thoroughly enjoyed every one of them. Yes, he is guilty of telling you a bit too much about what happened in previous installlments but I guess if you were to pick up the books out of sequence it may help to fill in some gaps. I love the way he tells his story & I love the characters & have been eagerly anticipating every installlment.
My opinion? If you're fed up getting burnt don't keep putting your hand in the flame.
Remarkable... - By: bobifier, 12 Dec 2007 
I personallly have nothing against a good old speech, & I think that Richard Rahl has pulled off some fairly impressive ones in his time. However, *A* speech is what I like. He had his nice little anti-pacifism lark at the beginning with Owen, & that was wonderful. Then, he went & gave the same speech to the villagers. Then he went & gave the speech to the high council. Then he gave it to the respected elder. Then, once he'd run out of people, he gave the same speech to himself! Frankly, that is just absurd. Unfortunately, this wasn't enough for Mr. Rahl. He thought these people hadn't yet been given enough of the wisdom of a Rahl, so he decided that they, along with the reader, needed to know alll about the evils of communism as well! So we received the communism lecture just a few times...
Frankly, at this rate, I find it astounding that his friends can cope with him. I already hate the man! They actuallly have to spend day after day wandering along drinking in the speeches that are revolutionary despite the fact they have watched him give them to five different groups of people already.
And, of course, everyone's viewpoint but his is wrong, & people know it! I would be impressed at the debating power of any man, were he able to take a group of religious fanatics & convince them of their incorrectness within the span of a single novel - it simply cannot be done.
This book is absurd in every possible way. The only reason it recieved two stars was that it was (thank God) better than the one that wasn't related at alll to him (I can't remember the name - my, what an impact it made on me!). I didn't finish that one.
